The Middle-Income Trap: Issues for Members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract. The problem faced by many of the economies making up the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) is whether they can avoid the middle-income trap and advance to the high-income level. What is needed for them to avoid such trap? This paper attempts to answer this question by building an analytical framework based on the factors that determine each development stage of an economy, and by comparing the current situation of four ASEAN middle-income countries with the experience of the Republic of Korea, a country that managed to overcome the middle-income trap and reach the high-income level in the late 1990s. The paper concludes that for ASEAN middle-income countries (Indonesia,Malaysia, thePhilippines, andThailand) to avoid the trap, they should strengthen research and development capability, emphasize the quality and appropriateness of human resources, and improve the institutional system for nourishing a dynamic private sector. These efforts can be expected to result in dynamic changes in the structure of comparative advantage toward higher skill and more innovation-intensive contents of products. For a low middle-income country such asVietnam, reforms and policies to increase the productivity of capital, land, and other resources are essential to avoid the early appearance of the trap.
Keywords: Economic development, growth, middle-income trap.References
[2] Spence, M., The Next Convergence: The Future of Economic Growth in a Multispeed World. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2011.
[3] Coxhead, I., A New Resource Curse? Impacts of China’s Boom on Comparative Advantage and Resource Dependence in Southeast Asia. World Development 35(7): 1, 2007, 099-119.
[4] Tran V.T., Tojoukoku no Gijutsu Donyuseisaku: Kankoku no Kieken (Technology import policy of developing countries: The experience of Korea). Nihon Keizai Kenkyu 16(December): 1986, 65-79.
[5] Park, S.O., Innovation Systems, Networks, and the Knowledge-Based Economy in Korea. In: Regions, Globalization, and the Knowledge-Based Economy, edited by J.H. Dunning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2000.
[6] Yusuf, S., et al., Innovative East Asia: The Future of Growth. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2003.
[7] Ohno, K., Avoiding the Middle-Income Trap: Renovating Industrial Policy Formulation in Vietnam. ASEAN Economic Bulletin 26(1): 2009a, 25-43.
[8] Datastream, Datastream Database, New York, 2011.
[9] http://www.tapchithoidai.org/ThoiDai14/200814_TranVanTho.htm. Reprinted in Tran (2011: 49-78).
[10] Amsden, A.H., The Rise of “The Rest”: Challenges of the West from Late-Industrializing Economies. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
[11] Amsden, A.H., and W. Chu, Beyond Late Development: [Taipei,China]’s Upgrading Policies. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2003.
[12] Asia Productivity Organization, Total Factor Productivity Growth: Survey Report. Tokyo: Asia Productivity Organization, 2007.
[13] Coxhead, I., and S. Jayasuriya, China, India and the Commodity Boom: Economic and Environmental Implications for Low-Income Countries. World Economy 33(4), 2010, 525-551.
[14] Hayami, Y., Development Economics. Tokyo: Sobunsha Publishing, 2000.
[15] Krugman, P., The Myth of Asia’s Miracle. Foreign Affairs 73(6) (November/December), 1994, 62-78.
[16] Minami, R., The Turning Point in Economic Development: Japan’s Experience. Tokyo: Kinokuniya Bookstore, 1973.
[17] ———, The Middle Income Trap: Implications for Industrialization Strategies in East Asia and Africa. Tokyo: GRIPS Development Forum, National Graduate Institute for Policies Studies, 2009b.
[18] ———, Hatten Tojokoku no Jissen (Practical Action of Development). Nihon Keizai Shinbun. 29 April-11 May, 2010.
[19] Rodrik, D., One Economics Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 2007.
[20] ———, From Gradualist Reforms to Building High Quality Institutions, Thoi Dai Moi, No. 14, August (in Vietnamese), 2008.
[21] ———, Development and Transition in the Vietnamese Economy. Tokyo: Keiso Shobo (in Japanese), 2010a.
[22] ———, The Impacts of [the People's Republic of] China on the Late Comers of East Asia: The Case of Vietnam. Paper presented to the international conference held by the 2010 Asia Economic Community Forum (Korea) on Post Crisis New World Order: Asia and G20. Incheon, Republic of Korea. 7-9 November, 2010b.
[23] ———, Vietnam since 2011: Catching up with the Time. Hanoi: Knowledge Publication (in Vietnamese), 2011.
[24] United Nations. various years, Comtrade Database, New York, NY: United Nations.
[25] United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), Trade and Development Report, Geneva, Switzerland: UNCTAD, 2002, 2010.
[26] United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), http://stats.uis.unesco.org/unesco/TableViewer/tableView.aspx? ReportId=3349&IF_Language=eng, 2011.
[27] US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Number of Patents Granted as Distributed by Year of Patent Grant Breakout by US State and Foreign Country of Origin, 2011. http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/cst_utl.htm.
[28] World Bank, The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1993.
[29] ———, The Growth Report: Strategies for Sustained Growth and Inclusive Development. Washington, DC: Commission on Growth and Development, World Bank, 2008.
[30] ———, Knowledge Assessment Methodology 2007. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2010. http://www.worldbank.org/kam.
———, World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2011.