Anh Thi Kim Nguyen, Ngoc Hong Le

Main Article Content

Abstract

Proposed in 1981 by John H. Dunning, the investment development path (known as the IDP model) has been considered to be an application of the eclectic paradigm. It is an expansion of Dunning’s terms on internationalizing activities of TNCs at a macro level in order to explain a country’s FDI patterns. The nature of the IDP model is a dynamic approach which examines the systematic relationship between a country’s net position of foreign direct investment (both inward and outward FDI) and its different stages of development. Recently, numerous authors around the world have conducted research about the development of investment using the IDP model for countries and/or groups of countries that have been effective in terms of policy implications. This article briefly collects and introduces some theoretical aspects of Dunning’s IDP model aiming at providing a theoretical framework for further research on FDI.

Keywords: Eclectic paradigm (OLI paradigm), Investment Development Path (IDP), John H. Dunning.

References

[1] Nha P.X., Foreign Direct Investment in Vietnam: Theories and Practices, Vietnam National University Press, Hanoi, 2013.
[2] Dunning J.H. and Narula R., “Explaining the International Direct Investment Position of Countries: Towards a Dynamic or Developmental Approach”, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 17 (1981), 30-46.
[3] Dunning J.H. and Narula R., “The Investment Development Path Revisited”, In: Dunning J.H., Theories and Paradigms of International Business Activity - The Selected Essays of John H. Dunning, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 1 (2002).
[4] Sathye S., “Investment Development Path Theory and the Case of India”, International Review of Business Research Papers, 4 (2008) 1, 299-309.
[5] Ramasamy B., “Malaysia’s Investment Development Path”, Malaysian Management Review, June 1998.
[6] Bensebaa F.B., “FDI-assisted Development in the light of the Investment Development Path Paradigm: Evidence from Central and Eastern European Countries”, Transnational Corporations, 17 (2008) 1, 37-67.
[7] Masca S.G. and Vaidean V.L., “Outward FDI and the Investment Development Path in Romania”, Romanian Journal of Economics, 31 (2010) 2, 49-64.
[8] Ellstrom E. and Engblad N., The Investment Development Path in Brazil, School of Economics and Management, Lund University, 2009.
[9] Duran J.J. and Ubeda F., “The Investment Development Path: A New Empirical Approach and some Theoretical Issues”, Transnational Corporations, 10 (2001) 2, 1-34.
[10] Narula R. and Dunning J.H., “Multinational enterprises, development and globalization: Some clarifications and a research agenda”, Oxford Development Studies, 38 (2010) 3, 263-287.
[11] Kun M., “An Empirical Analysis on Chinese Outward FDI Development Path Based on IDP and IPI Models”, M&D Forum, 2011, 258-262.
[12] Dang N.H., Vietnamese Enterprises’ Outward Foreign Direct Investment in the process of international economic integration, PhD Dissertation, University of Economics and Business, Vietnam National University in Hanoi, 2012.
[13] Quang P.T, Direct Investment of Vietnamese enterprises in Lao People’s Democratic Republic in the context of international integration, PhD Dissertation, National University of Economics, 2016.