Assessing the Committed Integration of Vietnam’s Distribution Services in AEC 2015
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract: The free flow of trade in services is one of the important elements in realizing the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) in 2015, where there will be substantially no restriction to ASEAN service suppliers in providing services within the region. In complying with the ASEAN Framework Agreement on Services (AFAS) commitment’s schedule and AEC Blueprint’s spirit, in the next few years,Vietnam will be moving towards opening up its services market, including distribution services, to other ASEAN nations. Recently,Vietnam has witnessed a strong evolvement of distribution services. A wide range of world-leading retail groups such as Metro Cash and Carry, Big C, Parkson,ZenPlaza andDiamondPlaza have run businesses inVietnam. The Vietnamese government has also reviewed and revised the legal framework related to distribution services to meet AFAS commitments. This paper examinesVietnam’s commitments in the distribution sector in the framework of AEC 2015 and uses an indexation method to quantify and assess the commitment level ofVietnam in the field of distribution services. The paper then comparesVietnam’s commitment level in distribution services with that of other service sectors and with that of other ASEAN nations in the distribution sector. The paper ends by making some conclusions about the level ofVietnam’s integration in distribution services and draws out some implications to further strengthenVietnam’s contribution in realizing the AEC’s objective for the free flow of the services trade by 2015.
Keywords: Distribution services, AEC, ASEAN, AFAS, Vietnam.References
[2] ASEAN (2012), ASEAN Economic Community Scorecard: Charting Progress toward Regional Economic Integration, Jakarta, Indonesia, ASEAN.
[3] Fukunaga, Y. & Ishido, H. (2013), Assessing the Progress of Services Liberalization in the ASEAN-China Free Trade Area (ACFTA). ERIA.
[4] Hiong, T. T. (2011), “ASEAN Integration in Trade in Services: Development, Challenges, and Way Forward”. ADBI-PECC Conference on Strategies to Enhance Competitiveness and Facilitate Regional Trade and Investment in Services, Hong Kong, China, 1-3 June.
[5] Hoekman, B. (1995), Tentative First Steps - An Assessment of the Uruguay Round Agreement on Services. World Bank.
[6] Ishido, H. (2011a), Liberalization of Trade in Services by APEC members: A Mapping Exercice. Chiba University.
[7] Ishido, H. (2011b), “Liberalization of Trade in Services under ASEAN+n: A Mapping Exercise”. ERIA Discussion Paper Series 2011-2, Jakarta, Indonesia: EIRA.
[8] Ishido, H. & Fukunaga, Y. (2012), “Liberalization of Trade in Services: Toward a Harmonized ASEAN ++ FTA”. ERIA Policy Brief, 2012-02, 1-7.
[9] Lakatos, A., Laurenza, E., Truong, D. T., Hoang, T. X., Hoang, T. T. H. & Ngo, C. K. (2010), “Rà soát khuôn khổ pháp lý về Dịch vụ phân phối ở Việt Nam và những khuyến nghị về sự phù hợp của các quy định chuyên ngành với cam kết WTO” (Review legislative framework on distrbution services in Vietnam and reccomendations for compliance with WTO committments). Hanoi, Vietnam: MUTRAP III.
[10] Lee, C. J. & Okabe, M. (2011), Comprehensive mapping of FTAs in ASEAN and East Asia, Jakarta, Indonesia: ERIA.
[11] Mcguire, G. (2008), Measuring and Modelling Restrictions on Trade in Services: A Case of Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Economies. Macao Regional Knowledge Hub.
Vietnam Commerical University & Economic Committee of National Assembly (2010), Các cam kết WTO về dịch vụ phân phối: Những vấn đề đặt ra đối với Việt Nam (WTO committments in distribution services: Issues for Vietnam), Hanoi, Vietnam, Statsitics Publishing House.