Financial Development and Renewable Energy Consumption - Empirical Evidence in Southeast and East Asian Countries
Main Article Content
Abstract
Climate change is one of the biggest challenges in our times. Climate change is happening such as rising in temperatures and sea level, drought, the destruction of the ozon layer. Climate change is consistent with a higher level of carbon dioxide that negatively affects human health and the economy. To mitigate the climate change, countries must reduce the emissions linked to the human activities in order to protect the earth safe as well as maintain economic growth in the context of sustainable development. In this case, renewable energy consumption is one of the most effective tools in the form of fighting against climate change. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the impact of financial development on renewable energy consumption in six Southeast Asian countries (i.e. Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and the Philippines) and three East Asian countries (i.e. China, Korea, and Japan). Using the generalized least squares method, the research results confirm that financial development has a negative impact on renewable energy consumption. The research results also find negative effects of inflation and urbanization rates on renewable energy use. Finally, economic growth and lending rates have no impact on renewable energy in the East and Southeast Asian countries.
References
[2] Levine, R., “Financial Development and Economic Growth: Views and Agenda,” Journal of Economic Literature, 35 (2) (1997) 688-726.
[3] Shahbaz, M., Raghutla, C., Chittedi, K. R., Jiao, Z., & Vo, X. V., “The Effect of Renewable Energy Consumption on Economic Growth: Evidence from the Renewable Energy Country Attractive Index,” Energy, 207 (2000) 118162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118162.
[4] Mukhtarov, S., Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H., “The Impact of Financial Development on Renewable Energy Consumption: Evidence from Turkey,” Renewable Energy, 187 (2022) 169-176 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.01.061.
[5] Saygin, O., & Iskenderoglu, O., “The Nexus between Financial Development and Renewable Energy Consumption: A Review for Emerging Countries,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29 (2022) 14522-14533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16690-5.
[6] Yang, J., Zhang, W., & Zhang, Z., “Impacts of Urbanization on Renewable Energy Consumption in China,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 114 (2016) 443-451. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.158.
[7] Lahiani, A., Mefteh-Wali, S., Shahbaz, M., & Vo, X. V., “Does Financial Development Influence Renewable Energy Consumption to Achieve Carbon Neutrality in the USA?,” Energy Policy, 158 (2021) 112524. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112524.
[8] Han, J., Zeeshan, M., Ullah, I., Rehman, A., & Afridi, F. E. A., “Trade Openness and Urbanization Impact on Renewable and Non-renewable Energy Consumption in China,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18353-x.
[9] Nathaniel, S., & Khan, S. A. R., “The Nexus between Urbanization, Renewable Energy, Trade, and Ecological Footprint in ASEAN Countries,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 272 (2020) 122709. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122709.
[10] Abdallah, W., Goergen, M., O’Sullivan, N., “Endogeneity: How Failure to Correct for It Can Cause Wrong Inferences and Some Remedies,” British Journal of Management, 26 (4) (2015)
791-804.
[11] Blundell, R.W., and Bond, S.R., “Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Model,” Journal of Econometrics, 87 (1998) 115-143.
[12] Moundigbaye, M., Rea, W.S., Reed, W.R., “Which Panel Data Estimator Should I Use: A Corrigendum and Extension,” 2017, http://www.economics-ejournal.org/dataset/comments/comment.2017-11-07.0953155334.pdf (Accessed March 22nd, 2022).
[13] Xiong, D., Yang, M., Chen, Q., Sun, Y., Cillo, G., Usai, A., & Wang, X., “How OFDI Promotes High-Technology Multinationals’ Innovation: From the Perspective of a Cross-Border Business Model,” Sustainability, 14 (3) (2022) 1417. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su14031417.