Nguyen Đang Minh

Main Article Content

Abstract

Abstract. Total productive maintenance (TPM) has been widely applied in many industrial fields, especially in Japanese industrial companies. From a management point of view, this is an activity that involves all members of the company, from company president down to the most junior company employee. From a point of view of economical effectiveness, a company can benefit from implementing company-wide TPM activities, such as, increasing the availability of existing equipment hence reducing manufacturing costs and reducing equipment investment cost. TPM is not just another “program for maintaining machines”. It is a program that can help a company to remain viable and to develop. This paper has reviewed the research relating to TPM world-wide and has found that the practical application of TPM in Japanese industrial plants has not been concretely discussed. The main purpose of this research is to carry out an empirical study on items in the actual manufacturing activities and to point out the practical application of TPM in Japanese industrial plants.

 

Keywords: Total productive maintenance, kaizen, productive manufacturing, safety, environment.

References

[1] Nakajima, S., “TPM Development Program: Implementing Total Productive Maintenance”, 1989, Productivity Press, Inc. Cambridge, MA.
[2] Chan, F.T.S H.C.W. Lau, R.W.L. Ip, H.K. Chan, S. Kong. “Implementation of total productive maintenance”, A case study. International Journal of Production Economics. 2005, Vol. 95: 71-94.
[3] Tajiri, M. and Gotoh, F., TPM Implementation: A Japanese Approach. 1992, McGraw-Hill.
[4] Shirose, K. “TPM for Operators”, 1994, Productivity Press Inc., Cambridge, MA.
[5] Willmott, P., “TPM: Total Productive Maintenance: The Western Way”, 1997, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
[6] Hartmann, E.H., “Successfully Installing TPM in a Non-Japanese Plant Total Productive Maintenance”, 1992, TPM Press, Inc, London.
[7] Bakerjan, R., “Tool and Manufacturing Engineers' Handbook, Continuous Improvement”, 1994 4th ed., ASME, Fairfield, NJ, Vol. 7.
[8] Rhyne, D.M., “Total plant performance advantages though total productive maintenance”, 1990 APICS, Conference Proceedings, Birmingham: 683-686.
[9] Pintelon, L.M. and, L.F. Gelders, “Maintenance management decision making”, European Journal of Operational Research, 1992, Vol. 58: 301-317.
[10] Rodrigues, M. and, K. Hatakeyama, “Analysis of the fall of TPM in companies”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2006, Vol. 179: 276-279.
[11] Swanson, L., “Linking maintenance strategies to performance”. International Journal of Production Economics, 2001 Vol. 70: 237-244.
[12] Robert J., “Total productive maintenance (TPM)”, Available from:
[13] JackRobert@TAMU_Commerce.edu (accessed June, 2007).
[14] Cua, K. O. and K. E. McKone, R. G. Schroeder, “Relationships between implementation of TQM, JIT, and TPM and manufacturing performance”, Journal of Operations Management, 2001, Vol. 19: pp 675-694.
McQueen G, “The buzz on benchmarking: compare your performance with the best to improve production and out cost, 1999, Maintenance Technology Magazine.