Nguyễn Bá Duy, Trần Thị Hương Giang

Main Article Content

Abstract

Microwave remote sensing or SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) data has been employed extensively to map open water bodies and to monitor flood extents, where cloud cover often prohibits the use of satellite sensors operating at other wavelengths. Where total inundation occurs, a low backscatter return is expected due to the specular reflection of SAR signal on the water surface. However, low local incidence angle and wind induced waves can cause a roughening of the water surface which result in a high return signal. It is also mean that the temporal variability (TV) of the backscatter from water bodies is higher than other land surfaces. The Mekong River Delta is a region with very long wet season (starting in May and lasting until October-November), resulting in almost crop fields also has low backscatter returns. Where such conditions occur adjacent to open water, this can make the separation of water and land problematic using SAR data. In this paper, we use seasonal time series C-band SAR data (dry season), we also examine how the variability in radar backscatter with incidence angle may be used to differentiate water from land overcoming. We carry out regression over multiple sets of seasonal time series data, determined by a moving window encompassing consecutively-acquired ENVISAT ASAR Wide Swath Mode data, to derive three backscatter model parameters: the slope β of a linear model fitting backscatter against local incidence angle; the backscatter normalized at 50° using the linear model coefficients so(50o), and the minimum backscatter (MiB) from time series data after normalized. A comparison of the three parameters (β, TV and MiB) shows that MiB in combination with TV provides the most robust means to segregate water from land by a simple thresholding algorithm.

Keywords: Water bodies mapping, SAR, time series analysis.

References

[1] A. Bartsch, A. M. Trofaier, G. Hayman, D. Sabel, S. Schlaffer, D. B. Clark, and E. Blyth, “Detection of open water dynamics with ENVISAT ASAR in support of land surface modelling at high latitudes,” Biogeosciences, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 703–714, Feb. 2012.
[2] A. Bartsch, C. Pathe, W. Wagner, and K. Scipal, “Detection of permanent open water surfaces in central Siberia with ENVISAT ASAR wide swath data with special emphasis on the estimation of methane fluxes from tundra wetlands,” Hydrol. Res., vol. 39, no. 2, p. 89, Mar. 2008.
[3] A. Bartsch, W. Wagner, K. Scipal, C. Pathe, D. Sabel, and P. Wolski, “Global monitoring of wetlands - the value of ENVISAT ASAR Global mode,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 90, no. 7, pp. 2226–2233, 2009.
[4] S. Quegan and J. J. Yu, “Filtering of multichannel SAR images,” Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 39, no. 11. pp. 2373–2379, 2001.
[5] C. Pathe, W. Wagner, D. Sabel, M. Doubkova, and J. B. Basara, “Using ENVISAT ASAR Global Mode Data for Surface Soil Moisture Retrieval Over Oklahoma, USA,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 468–480, Feb. 2009.
[6] J. Reschke, A. Bartsch, S. Schlaffer, and D. Schepaschenko, “Capability of C-Band SAR for Operational Wetland Monitoring at High Latitudes,” Remote Sens., vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 2923–2943, Oct. 2012.
[7] M. Silveira and S. Heleno, “Separation Between Water and Land in SAR Images Using Region-Based Level Sets,” Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, IEEE, vol. 6, no. 3. pp. 471–475, 2009.
[8] M. Santoro and U. Wegmuller, “Multi-temporal Synthetic Aperture Radar Metrics Applied to Map Open Water Bodies,” Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, IEEE Journal of, vol. PP, no. 99. pp. 1–14, 2013.
[9] A. Wendleder, B. Wessel, A. Roth, M. Breunig, K. Martin, and S. Wagenbrenner, “TanDEM-X Water Indication Mask: Generation and First Evaluation Results,” Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, IEEE Journal of, vol. 6, no. 1. pp. 171–179, 2013.
[10] C. Kuenzer, H. Guo, J. Huth, P. Leinenkugel, X. Li, and S. Dech, “Flood mapping and flood dynamics of the mekong delta: ENVISAT-ASAR-WSM based time series analyses,” Remote Sens., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 687–715, 2013.
[11] M. P. Makynen, A. T. Manninen, M. H. Simila, J. A. Karvonen, and M. T. Hallikainen, “Incidence angle dependence of the statistical properties of C-band HH-polarization backscattering signatures of the Baltic Sea ice,” Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 40, no. 12. pp. 2593–2605, 2002.
[12] P.-L. Frison and E. Mougin, “Use of ERS-1 Wind Scatterometer Data over Land Surfaces,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 550–560, 1996.
[13] J. a. Shufelt, “Performance evaluation and analysis of monocular building extraction from aerial imagery,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 311-326, Apr. 1999.
[14] G. M. Foody, “Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment,” Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 185–201, Apr. 2002.