Pauline Violanda Hostalero, Nguyen Thi Ha

Main Article Content


Land use change has been assessed widely using Remote Sensing (RS) and Geographic Information System (GIS) techniques. The analysis of land use change was done by detecting land cover change. A study about land cover change, along with the self-employed workers’ perception towards changes between 2007 and 2017 were carried out in Nam Tu Liem District, Hanoi, Vietnam. The result of the study shows that the built-up lands have increased and remained to be the dominant land cover types in 2017. The agriculture has been declining mainly due to conversion into built-up land. Other land type including water, bare land, and vegetation have shown slight changes throughout the years. Overall changes from 2007 to 2017 shown that built-up land gained the most and agriculture land lost the most. On the other hand, the perception study’s major findings indicate that about two-thirds (69%) of respondents are aware of changes. However, almost one-third (31%) are unaware of the said topic. There are several factors that may affect the awareness of self-employed workers which will be cursory discussed in the study. This study in Nam Tu Liem District is a first step to determine and understand the major driving factors and their impacts on the land use changes in the area. A detailed land use/cover change study and a larger population size for perception studies are recommended in order for the government to formulate policies to achieve sustainable development.




Keywords: Land use change, urbanization, change detection, remote sensing, geographic information system, awareness.


[1] M. A. Mahamud, N. Samat, and N. M. Noor. Identifying factors influencing urban spatial growth for the George Town Conurbation. Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners, 2016, 14(5): 95–106.
[2] Q. H. Vuong. Vietnam's Political Economy: A discussion on the 1986-2016 period. Centre Emile Bernheim Working Paper, N°14/010. University Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels: Belgium, 2014.
[3] World Bank. East Asia’s Changing Urban Landscape: Measuring a Decade of Spatial Growth. World Bank; Washington, DC, USA, 2015.
[4] General Statistics Office of Vietnam. The 2014 Viet Nam Intercensal Population and Housing Survey: Major Findings. Statistical Documentation and Service Center, Hanoi, Vietnam, 2014.
[5] Vietnam Institute of Architecture Urban and Rural Planning. The Hanoi Capital Construction Master Plan 2030 and Vision to 2050, Comprehensive Report. VIAP, Hanoi, Vietnam, 2011.
[6] A. R. Trihamdani, T. Kubota, H. S. Lee, K. Sumida, and T. T. T. Phuong. Impacts of land use changes on urban heat islands in Hanoi, Vietnam: Scenario analysis. Procedia Engineering, 2017, 198: 525–529.
[7] T. Hoang. New green area for Hanoi. Vietnam Economic Times [Online], 2015. Retrieved from:
[8] J. S. Rawat, and M. Kumar. Monitoring land use/cover change using remote sensing and GIS techniques: A case study of Hawalbagh block, district Almora, Uttarakhand, India. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences, 2015, 18: 77–84.
[9] Partoyo and R. P. Shrestha. Modeling Effect of Conservation and Livelihood Policies on Community Land Use and Management in Yogyakarta. In: Redefining Diversity & Dynamics of Natural Resources Management in Asia, 2017, 1: 67–90.
[10] P. Journeaux, E. van Reenen, T. Manjala, S. Pike, and I. Hanmore. Analysis of Drivers and Barriers to Land Use Change. Hamilton, NZ: AgFirst Waikato Ltd., 2017.
[11] B. Zondag, and J. Borsboom. Driving Forces of Land-Use Change. Paper prepared for the 49th ERSA conference, Lodz, Poland, 2009.
[12] M. G. Turner, and C. L. Ruscher. Change in landscape patterns in Georgia. USA Landscape Ecology, 2004, 1(4): 251–421.
[13] W. Steffen, R. A. Sanderson, P. D. Tyson, J. Jäger, P. A. Matson, B. Moore III, F. Oldfield, K. Richardson, H. J. Schellnhuber, B. L. Turner II, and R. J. Wasson. Global Change and the Earth System: A Planet Under Pressure. Berlin: Springer, 2004.
[14] B. L. Turner II, E. F. Lambin, and A. Reenberg. The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of the America, 2007, 104(52): 20666–20671.
[15] A. A. Belal and F. S. Moghanm. Detecting Urban Growth Using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques in Al Gharbiya Governorate, Egypt. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 2011, 14: 73–79.
[16] J. Wu. Land Use Changes: Economic, Social, and Environmental Impacts. Choices, 2008, 23(4): 6–10.
[17] G. Xu, L. Jiao, S. Zhao, M. Yuan, X. Li, Y. Han, B. Zhang, and T. Dong. Examining the Impacts of Land Use on Air Quality from a Spatio-Temporal Perspective in Wuhan, China. Atmosphere, 2016, 7(5): 62.
[18] H. Zhang, Z.-F. Qi, X.-Y. Ye, Y.-B. Cai, W.-C. Ma, and M.-N. Chen. Analysis of land use/land cover change, population shift, and their effects on spatiotemporal patterns of urban heat islands in metropolitan Shanghai China. Applied Geography, 2013, 44: 121–133.
[19] M. Moore, P. Gould, and B. S. Keary. Global Urbanization and Impact on Health. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 2003, 206: 269–278.
[20] D. A. Leon. Cities, urbanization and health. International Journal of Epidemiology, 2008, 37(1): 4–8.
[21] Japan International Cooperation Agency. The Comprehensive Urban Development Programme in Hanoi Capital City of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (HAIDEP): Master Plan Study. Final Report, 2007.
[22] K. J. H. Williams and J. Schirmer. Understanding the relationship between social change and its impacts: The experience of rural land use change in south-eastern Australia. Journal of Rural Studies, 2012, 28(4): 538–548.
[23] Nhan Dan. Hanoi has two new districts: Bac Tu Liem, Nam Tu Liem. [Online], 2013. Retrieved from:
[24] Hanoi Statistical Office. Statistical Yearbook of 2017. Statistics Office of Nam Tu Liem District, 2017.
[25] United States Geological Survey (USGS). Retrieved from:
[26] K. Neupane. An Assessment of Land Use Land Cover Change in Barandabhar Forest Corridor, Chitwan District, Nepal. Bachelor of Science in Forestry Degree. Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu Forestry College, Kathmandu, Nepal, 2016.
[27] The Geauga County Planning Commission. Newbury Township Geauga County, Ohio Land Use Plan, 2008. Retrieved from:
[28] N. Horning. Land cover classification methods. American Museum of Natural History, Center for Biodiversity and Conservation, 2004.
[29] P. S. Chavez Jr. An improved dark-object subtraction technique for atmospheric scattering correction for multispectral data. Remote Sensing of Environment 1988, 24: 459–479.
[30] C. Song, C. E. Woodcock, K. C. Seto, M. P. Lenne, and S. A. Macomber. Classification and Change Detection Using Landsat TM Data: When and How to Correct Atmospheric Effects? Remote Sensing of Environment, 2001, 75(2): 230–244.
[31] F. Mwakapuja, E. Liwa, and J. Kashaigili. Usage of Indices for Extraction of Built-up Areas and Vegetation Features from Landsat TM Image: A Case of Dar Es Salaam and Kisarawe Peri-Urban Areas, Tanzania. International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 2013, 3(7): 273-283.
[32] G. A. Banko. Review of Assessing the Accuracy of Classifications of Remotely Sensed Data and of Methods Including Remote Sensing Data in Forest Inventory. Interim Report IR-98-081. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIAA). Laxenburg, Austria, 1998.
[33] D. G. Brown, C. Polsky, P. Bolstad, S. D. Brody, D. Hulse, R. Kroh, T. R. Loveland, and A. Thomson. Land use and land cover change. In: J. M. Melillo, T. C. Richmond, and G. W. Yohe (eds) Climate Change Impacts in the United States, The Third National Climate Assessment. US Global Change Research Program, 2014, 318–332.
[34] M. Maimaitiyiming, A. Ghulam, T. Tiyip, F. Pla, P. Latorre-Carmona, Ü. Halik, and S. Caetano. Effects of green space spatial pattern on land surface temperature: Implications for sustainable urban planning and climate change adaptation. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2014, 89: 59–66.
[35] J. R. Anderson, E. E. Hardy, J. T. Roach, and R. E. Witmer. A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, No. 964. USGS, Washington, D.C., 1976.
[36] Y. A. E. Elhadary, N. Samat, and F. Obeng-Odoom. Development at the Peri-Urban Area and Its Impact on Agricultural Activities: An Example from the Seberang Perai Region, Penang State, Malaysia. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 2013, 37(7): 834–856.