Nghiem Trung Dung, Nguyen Thi Yen Lien, Tran Thu Trang, Dao Duy Nam

Main Article Content


Potentiality of co-benefits for public transport at cities of different grades in Vietnam namely Ho Chi Minh city (special city), Da Nang (centrally-run grade I city) and Vinh (grade I city under the province) in 2013 was studied. Taxis in Da Nang and Vinh, and buses in Ho Chi Minh City were selected for the study. A same methodology was used for all cities. In each city, three areas and nine routes in inner city were selected for conducting this study. Information on the technical conditions of vehicles was collected by questionnaires. Traffic volume was determined by vehicle counting. The real–world driving data of vehicles were recorded by GPS technology. All collected data were processed to generate input files to run IVE model associated with base state and three proposed scenarios of climate change mitigation. Emission factors (EF) of air pollutants for these transport means were determined. Co-benefits of climate, air quality and health for the scenarios in three cities were assessed. The obtained results in this study can be used as a scientific basis for integrated air quality management in the cities in general and for air pollution control of public transport in particular.

 co-benefits, public transport, emission factor, IVE model, Vietnam.

Keywords: co-benefits, public transport, emission factor, IVE model, Vietnam.


[1] Tran Thu Trang, Huynh Hai Van, Nguyen Thi Kim Oanh, Traffic emission inventory for estimation of air quality and climate co-benefits of faster technology intrusion in Hanoi, Journal of Carbon Management 6 (2015) 117-128.
[2] MONRE, National State of Environment - Vietnam Urban Air Environment 2007. (accessed 17 April 2018).
[3] World Health Organization (WHO), Burden of disease from Ambient Air Pollution for 2012 - Summary of results. health_topics/outdoorair/databases (accessed 20 May 2018).
[4] International Sustainable Systems Research Center ISSRC, IVE Model User’s Manual Version 2.0. (accessed 21 June 2015).
[5] J. L. Jimenez, Understanding and Quantifying Motor Vehicle Emissions with Vehicle Specific Power and TILDES Remote Sensing, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts, 1999.
[6] Nguyen Thu Trang, Nghiem Trung Dung, Tran Thu Trang, Potentiality of Co-benefits of climate and air quality in fuel switching for Hanoi bus system, Journal of Science and Technology 49 (2011) 117-128.
[7] Nghiem Trung Dung, Tran Thi Nhung, Tran Thu Trang, Co-benefits of air quality and climate for taxi system in Hanoi associated with selected control scenarios, Journal of Science and Technology 51 (2013) 104-111.
[8] Nghiem Trung Dung, Ho Tuan Anh (2014). Climate and air quality co-benefits of improving taxi system in Ha Long city, Quang Ninh, Journal of Science and Technology 52 (2014) 185 - 194.
[9] Régis Briant, Irène Korsakissok, Christian Seigneur, An improved line source model for air pollutant dispersion from roadway traffic, Atmospheric Environment 44 (2011)4099-4107.
[10] World Health Organization (WHO), AirQ+: software tool for health risk assessment of air pollution. environment-and-health/air-quality/ activities/airq-software-tool-for-health-risk-assessment-of-air-pollution (accessed 10 August 2018).
[11] Long Ngo, Sumi Mehta, Dung Do, Thuan Thach, The Effects of Short-term Exposure on Hospital Admissions for Acute Lower Respiratory Infections in Young Children of Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam, Epidemiology 22 (2011) S228-S229. 28666.ed.
[12] Hyunjoo Bae, Jeongim Park, The Effects of Fine and Coarse Particles on Daily Mortality in Seoul, Korea, Epidemiology 22 (2011) S228. https://
[13] Haidong Kan, Dongfeng Gu, Association between Long-term Exposure to Outdoor Air Pollution and Mortality in China: A Cohort Study, Epidemiology 22 (2011) S29.
[14] Yu-Chun Wang, Chun-Chi Chiang, Fung-Chang Sung, Chien-Chang Liao, Pei-Chun Chen, Increased Risk of Acute and Chronic Conjunctivitis Associated with Ambient Air Quality in Taiwan, Epidemiology 22 (2011) S222. 62731.27.
[15] Abdullah Yasar, Rizwan Haider, Amtul Bari Tabinda, Fidous Kausar, Maryam Khan, A Comparison of Engine Emissions from Heavy, Medium, and Light Vehicles for CNG, Diesel, and Gasoline Fuels, Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 22 (2013) 1277-1281.
[16] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Report to Congress on Black Carbon, Chapter 2: Black Carbon and Its Effects on Climate. (accessed 10 August 2018).
[17] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, GHG Equivalencies Calculator - Calculations and References. (accessed 15 August 2018).
[18] Matthias Ketzel, Gunnar Omstedt, Christer Johansson, Ingo During, Mia Pohjola, Dietmar Oettl, Ruwim Berkowicz, Estimation and validation of PM2.5/PM10 exhaust and non-exhaust emission factors for practical street pollution modelling, Atmospheric Environment 41 (2007) 9370 – 9385.
[19] C.A. Brebbia, J.W.S. Longhurst, Air Pollution XVI: Definition of PM10 emission factors from traffic: use of tracers and definition of background concentration, WIT Pres, 2008.
[20] Mazouzi Raja, Health benefits of cleaner fuels: Unleaded gasoline and low sulfur Fuel, Ministry of Public Health, Directorate of hygiene and Environmental Protection, 2009.
[21] The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China, Expansion of Hong Kong International Airport into a Three-Run.