Tran Tien Khoi, Nguyen Dang Hoang Chuong, Hoang Gia Phuc, Nguyen Thi Thuy, Nguyen Nhat Huy

Main Article Content

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to use ferrate as an all-in-one alternative for the removal of chlorine-consumed compositions such as organic, color, turbidity, iron, and manganese in river water for water supply purposes. Ferrate (FeO42-) was simultaneously employed as coagulant and oxidant for purification of Saigon River water in order to reduce the formation of disinfection by-products in the produced tap water. The Jartest was conducted using both ferrate for raw river water and poly-aluminum chloride (PAC) for chlorinated water to determine the optimum concentration of chemicals and pH values as well as comparing the effectiveness of ferrate and traditional coagulation with pre-chlorination technology for surface water purification. Results showed that ferrate could be used to remove organic compounds with high efficiency of 86.2% at pH 5 - 6 and ferrate concentration of 16 mgFe/L. Moreover, the removal efficiency for turbidity, color, and iron were at least 90%, indicating that ferrate would be a very promising alternative for chlorine and PAC for water purification.
Keywords: ferrate, natural organic matters removal, water purification, DBPs control.

References

[1] V.N. Trang, L.D. Phuong, N.P. Dan, B.X. Thanh, C. Visvanathan, Assessment on the trihalomethanes formation potential of Tan Hiep Water Treatment Plant, J Water Sustain 2 (2012) 43-53. https://doi.org/10.11912/jws.2.1.43-53.
[2] R. Sadiq, M.J. Rodriguez, Disinfection by-products (DBPs) in drinking water and predictive models for their occurrence: a review, Sci. Total Environ. 321 (2004) 21-46. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.scitotenv.2003.05.001.
[3] S. Chowdhury, P. Champagne, P.J. McLellan, Models for predicting disinfection byproduct (DBP) formation in drinking waters: a chronological review, Sci. Total Environ. 407 (2009) 4189-4206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scito tenv.2009.04.006.
[4] T. Bond, J. Huang, M.R. Templeton, N. Graham, Occurrence and control of nitrogenous disinfection by-products in drinking water – A review, Water Res. 45 (2011) 4341-4354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.05.034.
[5] S.D. Richardson, M.J. Plewa, E.D. Wagner, R. Schoeny, D.M. DeMarini, Occurrence, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity of regulated and emerging disinfection by-products in drinking water: a review and roadmap for research, Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research 636 (2007) 178-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrr ev.2007.09.001.
[6] E. Agus, N. Voutchkov, D.L. Sedlak, Disinfection by-products and their potential impact on the quality of water produced by desalination systems: a literature review, Desalination 237 (2009) 214-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.11.059.
[7] C.G. Graves, G.M. Matanoski, R.G. Tardiff, Weight of evidence for an association between adverse reproductive and developmental effects and exposure to disinfection by-products: a critical review, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 34 (2001) 103-124. https://doi.org/10.1006/rtph.2001.1494.
[8] A. Matilainen, M. Vepsäläinen, M. Sillanpää, Natural organic matter removal by coagulation during drinking water treatment: A review, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 159 (2010) 189-197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2010.06.007.
[9] T. Chaiket, P.C. Singer, A. Miles, M. Moran, C. Pallotta, Effectiveness of coagulation, ozonation, and biofiltration in controlling DBPs, Journal (American Water Works Association) 94 (2002) 81-95. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.2002. tb10251.x.
[10] A. Matilainen, M. Sillanpää, Removal of natural organic matter from drinking water by advanced oxidation processes, Chemosphere 80 (2010) 351-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere. 2010.04.067.
[11] K. Prabhat Rai, J. Lee, S.K. Kailasa, E.E. Kwon, Y.F. Tsang, Y.S. Ok, K.-H. Kim, A critical review of ferrate(VI)-based remediation of soil and groundwater, Environ. Res. 160 (2018) 420-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.016.
[12] A. Talaiekhozani, M.R. Talaei, S. Rezania, An overview on production and application of ferrate (VI) for chemical oxidation, coagulation and disinfection of water and wastewater, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 5 (2017) 1828-1842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017. 03.025.
[13] V.K. Sharma, Potassium ferrate(VI): an environmentally friendly oxidant, Adv. Environ. Res. 6 (2002) 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S1093-0191(01)00119-8.
[14] J.-Q. Jiang, B. Lloyd, Progress in the development and use of ferrate(VI) salt as an oxidant and coagulant for water and wastewater treatment, Water Res. 36 (2002) 1397-1408. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00358-X.
[15] D. Ghernaout, M.W. Naceur, Ferrate(VI): In situ generation and water treatment – A review, Desalination and Water Treatment 30 (2011) 319-332. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2011.2217.
[16] K.T. Tien, N. Graham, J.-Q. Jiang, Evaluating the coagulation performance of ferrate: A preliminary study, ACS Symp. Ser 985 (2008) 292-305. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2008-0985.ch017.
[17] N. Graham, T. Khoi, J.-Q. Jiang, Oxidation and coagulation of humic substances by potassium ferrate, Water Sci. Technol. 62 (2010) 929-936. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2010.369.
[18] J.-Q. Jiang, S. Wang, A. Panagoulopoulos, Comparative performance of potassium ferrate (VI) in drinking water and sewage treatment, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, Rhodes Island, Greece (2005) 1-3. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/19443994.2014.938303.
[19] V.K. Sharma, R. Zboril, R.S. Varma, Ferrates: Greener Oxidants with Multimodal Action in Water Treatment Technologies, Acc. Chem. Res. 48 (2015) 182-191. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar 5004219.