Nguyen Cong Hai, Phan Tan Luom, Le Thi Thuy Ha

Main Article Content

Abstract

In this study, diatom species composition of Dinh River tributaries, Quy Hop district, Nghe An province was investigated in three surveys (April 2021, February 2022, and April 2022). A total of 40 diatom species and subspecies were identified, classified into 16 genera, 13 families, 3 suborders, 10 orders, 2 subclasses, 2 classes, and 2 subphyla. The class Bacillariophyceae was dominant, accounting for 38 taxa (95%), whereas Coscinodiscophyceae was represented by only 2 taxa (5%). The most species-rich genera were Iconella (7 taxa), Ulnaria (6), Cymbella (5), Pinnularia (4), and Navicula (3); additionally, 4 genera contained 2 taxa, and 7 genera contained a single taxon. Among the four surveyed sites, site 2 (Tran Khanh Quang) exhibited the highest species richness (33 taxa), while site 1 (Lang Con Branch, Nam Ton) had the lowest (15 taxa). Species diversity analysis using Sorensen and Beta diversity indices confirmed this pattern, with site 1 showing the lowest diversity (S = 0.50–0.56; ß = 2.08).

Keywords: Bacillariophyta, Diatom, Dinh River, Nghe An, Quy Hop.

References

[1] J. Grønning, T. Kiørboe, Diatom Defence: Grazer Induction and Cost of Shell‐thickening, Functional Ecology, Vol. 34, No. 9, 2020, pp. 1790-1801, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13635.
[2] A. Danz, C. A. Quandt, A Review of the Taxonomic Diversity, Host-parasite Interactions, and Experimental Research on Chytrids that Parasitize Diatoms, Frontiers in Microbiology, Vol. 14, 2023, pp. 1-26,
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1281648.
[3] L. E. Graham, L. W. Wilcox, Algae, Prentice-Hall, London, UK, 2000.
[4] P. Falkowski, R. J. Scholes, E. Boyle, J. Canadell, D. Canfield, J. Elser, N. Gruber, K. Hibbard, P. Högberg, S. Linder, F. T. Mackenzie, B. Moore III, T. Pedersen, Y. Rosenthal, S. Seitzinger, V. Smetacek, W. Steffen, The Global Carbon Cycle: A Test of Our Knowledge of Earth as a System, Science, New Series, Vol. 290, No. 5490, 2000, pp. 291-296,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5490.291.
[5] E. G. Bellinger, D. C. Sigee, Freshwater Algae: Identification and Use as Bioindicators, Antony Rowe, Ltd., Chippenham, 2010, pp. 285.
[6] L. T. T. Ha, Phytoplankton in the Southwest of the Lam River System (Nghe An - Ha Tinh), Doctoral Thesis in Biology, Vinh University, 2004 (in Vietnamese).
[7] T. T. Duong, A. F. Mazel, M. Coste, D. K. Dang, A. Boudou, Dynamics of Diatom Colonization Process in some Rivers Influenced by Urban Pollution (Hanoi, Vietnam), Ecological Indicators, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2007, pp. 839-851,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.10.003.
[8] V. Hanh (Ed.), N. D. San, L. T. T. Ha, M. V. Chung, H. S. Hanh, N. D. Dien, Phytoplankton in Water Bodies in the North Central Region, Science Publishing House and Engineering, 2022 (in Vietnamese).
[9] T. L. Pham, Comparison between Water Quality Index (WQI) and Biological Indices, Based on Planktonic Diatom for Water Quality Assessment in the Dong Nai River, Vietnam, Pollution, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2016, pp. 311-323,
https://doi.org/10.7508/pj.2017.02. 012.
[10] T. L. Pham, Use of Benthic Diatom Indices for Assessing Ecological Status of the Sai Gon River, Vietnam, Life Sciences Biology, Vol. 60, No. 1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.31276/VJSTE.60(1).50.
[11] I. Renberg, A Procedure for Preparing Large Sets of Diatom Slides from Sediment Cores, Journal of Paleolimnology, Vol. 4, 1990, pp. 87-90, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00208301.
[12] M. S. Kulikovskiy, A. M. Glushchenko, S. I. Kuznetsova, Identification Book of Diatoms from Russia, Filigran, Yaroslavl, 2016 (in Russian).
[13] S. I. Genkal, M. S. Kulikovskiy, I. V. Kuznetsova, Modern Freshwater Centric Diatom Algae in Russia, Filigran, Yaroslavl, 2020 (in Russian).
[14] M. M. Zabelina, I. A. Kiselev, A. N. Proshkina, V. S. Sheshukova, Diatoms, Key to Identifying Freshwater Algae (Former Soviet Union), Publishing House "Soviet Science", Moscow, Vol. 4, 1951 (in Russian).
[15] A. Shirota, The Plankton of South Vietnam: Fresh Water and Marine Plankton, Overseas Technical Cooperation Agency, Japan, 1968, pp. 226-232.
[16] M. D. Guiry, M. D. Guiry, G. M. Guiry, AlgaeBase, World-wide Electronic Publication, National University of Ireland, Galway, https://www.algaebase.org, 2024 (accessed on: April 17th, 2024).
[17] A. E. Magurran, Measuring Biological Diversity, Blackwell Science Ltd, USA, 2004.
[18] R. Jahn, W-H Kusber, C. Cocquyt, Differentiating Iconella from Surirella (Bacillariophyceae): Typifying Four Ehrenberg Names and a Preliminary Checklist of the African Taxa, PhytoKeys, Vol. 82, 2017, pp. 73-112.