Densification mechanism and structural transformation in glass: molecular dynamic simulation
Main Article Content
Abstract
The structure of GeO2 glass is investigated via molecular dynamic simulation. The influence of pressure to the structure of GeO2 glass is due to the change of short-range order, network structure, domain structure and free volume regions. The obtained results show that the structure of GeO2 was formed by a continuous random network of basic structural units linking to each other via with corner-sharing, edge-sharing, face-sharing bond. At low pressure, the basic structural units are mainly linked via one bridge oxygen (the corner sharing bonds). As pressure increases, the fraction of edge sharing bonds (two bridge oxygen) increases meanwhile the fraction of corner sharing bonds significantly decrease. There is a slight increase with the fraction of face- sharing bonds (three bridge oxygen). The Ge-O bond distance is almost not dependent on pressure, meanwhile the Ge-Ge and O-O bond distances are significantly dependent on pressure. Under compression, the average coordination number of Ge tends to increase from fourfold (at ambient pressure) to six-fold (at high pressure). Moreover, structure of GeO2 glass has two-domain near 15 and 25 GPa. And at ambient pressure or high pressures, the struture of GeO2 glass has single domain. The dependence of the distribution of free volumes on pressure in GeO2 glass has been examined. The distribution of void radius has the Gaussian form and the position of the peak tend to shift to the left under compression.
References
[2] J. Peralta, G. Gutierrez, Pressure-induced Structural Transition in Amorphous GeO2: a Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Eur. Phys. J. B, Vol. 87, No. 11, 2014, pp. 257-266, https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2014-50176-3.
[3] B. Walker, C. C. Dharmawardhana, N. Dari, P. l. Rulis, W. Ching, Electronic Structure and Optical Properties of Amorphous GeO2 Incomparison to Amorphous SiO2, J. Non-Cryst, Solids, Vol. 428, 2015, pp. 176-183, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.08.018.
[4] J. F. Lin, H. Fukui, D. Prendergast, T. Okuchi, Y. Q. Cai, N. Hiraoka, C. S. Yoo, A. Trave, P. Eng, M. Y. Hu,
P. Chow, Electronic Bonding Transition in Compressed SiO2 Glass, Phys. Rev. B, Vol. 75, No. 1, 2007,
pp. 012201-012205, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.75.012201.
[5] Y. Liang, C. R. Miranda, S. Scandolo, Tuning Oxygen Packing in Silica by Nonhydrostatic Pressure, Phys. Rev. B, Vol. 99, No. 21, 2007, pp. 215504-215509, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.215504.
[6] L. Huang, J. Kieffer, Amorphous-Amorphous Transitions in Silica Glass, I Reversible Transitions and Thermo-Mechanical Anomalies, Phys. Rev. B, Vol. 69, No. 22, 2004, pp. 224203-224214, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.69.224203.
[7] G. Lelong, L. Cormier, G. Ferlat, V. Giordano, G.S. Henderson, A. Shukla and G. Calas, Evidence of fivefold-coordinated Ge atoms in amorphous GeO2 under pressure using inelastic x-ray scattering,Phys. Rev. B, Vol. 85, No.13, 2012, pp. 134202-134207. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.134202.
[8] Y. Lin, Q. Zeng, W. Yang, W. L. Mao, Pressure-induced Densification in GeO2 Glass: A Transmission X-Ray Microscopy Study, Appl. Phys. Lett, Vol. 103, No. 26, 2013, pp. 261909-261914, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4860993.
[9] Q. Mei, C. J. Benmore, J. K. R. Weber, Structure of Liquid SiO2: A Measurement by High-Energy X-Ray Diffraction, Phys. Rev. Lett, Vol. 98, No. 5, 2007, pp. 057802-057806, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.057802.
[10] V. V. Le , G. T. Nguyen, Molecular Dynamics Study of Mechanical Behavior in Silica Glass Under Uniaxial Deformation, Computational Materials Science, Vol. 159, 2019, pp. 385-396, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.12.045.
[11] X. Hong, M. Newville, T. S. Duffy, S. R. Sutton, M. L. Rivers, X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy of GeO2 Glass to 64 GPa, J. Phys, Condens. Matter, Vol. 26, No. 3, 2014, pp. 03510-03519, https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/26/3/035104.
[12] V. V. Hoang, Static and Dynamic Properties of Simulated Liquid and Amorphous GeO2, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2005, pp. 777-786, https://doi.org/ 10.1088/0953-8984/18/3/003.
[13] V. V. Hoang, N. H. T. Anh, H. Zung, Liquid–liquid Phase Transition and Anomalous Diffusion in Simulated Liquid GeO2, Phys. B: Condens. Matter, Vol. 390, No. 1-2, 2007, pp 17-22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2006.07.021.
[14] D. Marrocchelli, M. Salanne, P. A. Madden, C. Simon, P. Turq, The Construction of a Reliable Potential for GeO2 from First Principles, Mol.Phys, Vol. 107, No. 4-6, 2009, pp. 443-452,
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00268970902845347.
[15] D. Marrocchelli, M. Salanne, P. A. Madden, High-pressure Behaviour of GeO2: A Simulation Studyj. Phys. Condens. Matter, Vol. 22, No. 15, 2010, pp. 443-452, https://doi.org/ 10.1088/0953-8984/22/15/152102.
[16] J. W. E. Drewitt, P. S. Salmon, A. C. Barnes, S. Klotz, H. E. Fischer, W. A. Crichto, Structure of GeO2 Glass at Pressures up to 8.6 GPa, Phys. Rev. B, Vol. 81, No. 1, 2010, pp. 014202-014215,
https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.014202.
[17] X. Hong, L. Ehm, T. S. Duffy, Polyhedral Units and Network Connectivity in GeO2 Glass at High Pressure: an X-Ray Total Scattering Investigation Appl, Phys. Lett, Vol. 105, No. 8, 2014, pp. 081904-081909, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4894103.
[18] M. Micoulaut, Structure of Densified Amorphous Germanium Dioxide, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, Vol. 16, No. 10, 2004, pp. L131- L138, https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/16/10/L03.