Nguyen Tuan Hung, Nguyen Huy Hoang

Main Article Content


Action research (AR), which involve rigorous cycles of implementing and reflecting on educational changes, brings genuine values to language teaching. However, due to several factors related to school cultures and the teacher-researchers, AR does not always live up to its expectations. Generally, previous studies have steered towards instigating an awareness of AR at the expense of obtaining empirical evidence on competencies and conditions for AR. This study examines teachers’ action research competencies and challenges in doing AR. A questionnaire (70 items, α = 0.809) was administered to 105 EFL teachers in various high schools in Vietnam. Among these participants, eight partook in follow-up semi-structured interviews. Chi-square analysis confirmed that top-rated competencies aligned with the traditional roles of high school English teachers, including giving feedback, using visual aids for presentations, and self-assessment. In contrast, teachers were least sure of their research skills and techniques. Thematic analysis complemented the quantitative data, ascribing the underdeveloped research capacity to a lack of guidelines, motivation, and resources. Consequently, the practice of AR might be improved with the cultivation of a teacher research culture. Other measures to incentivize high school EFL teachers in research engagement are also discussed in this paper.

Keywords: action research; research competencies; high school English teachers; research difficulties.


[1] S. Borg, Teacher Research in Language Teaching: A Critical Analysis, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
[2] A. Burns, J.C. Richards, The Cambridge Guide to Second Language Teacher Education, Cambridge University Press, 2009.
[3] E. S. Johnson, Action Research, In G. W. Noblit (ed), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education, Oxford University Press, 2020.
[4] K. E. Johnson, P. R. Golombek, The Transformative Power of Narrative in Second Language Teacher Education, Tesol Quarterly, Vol. 45, No. 3, 2011, pp. 486-509.
[5] D. Nunan, K. M. Bailey, Exploring Second Language Classroom Research: A Comprehensive Guide, Boston, MA: Heinle, Cengage Learning, 2009.
[6] Q. Wang, H. Zhang, Promoting Teacher Autonomy Through University-School Collaborative Action Research, Language Teaching Research, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2011, pp. 222-241.
[7] E. Edwards, A. Burns, Language Teacher Action Research: Achieving Sustainability, ELT Journal, Vol. 70, No. 1, 2016, pp. 6-15.
[8] M. Kubanyiova, G. Crookes, Re‐Envisioning, The Roles, Tasks, and Contributions of Language Teachers in The Multilingual Era of Language Education Research and Practice, The Modern Language Journal, Vol. 100, No. 1, 2016, pp. 117-132.
[9] Official Dispatch No.2069/BGDĐT-NGCBQLGD on Guidelines for Implementing Essential Requirements of Competencies for EFL School Teachers, Hanoi, Vietnam: Ministry of Education and Training, 2020.
[10] A. Burns, Action Research in English Language Teaching: Contributions and Recent Developments, Second Handbook of English Language Teaching, 2019, pp. 991-1005.
[11] M. C. Smith, S. L. Lytle, The Teacher Research Movement: A Decade Later, Educational Researcher, Vol. 28, No. 7, 1999, pp. 15-25.
[12] L. Stenhouse, The Teacher as Researcher: Controversies in Classroom Research, (2nd ed), Martyn Hannersley (ed.), Buckingham: Open University Press, 1993.
[13] L. Stenhouse, The Relevance of Practice to Theory, Theory into Practice, Vol. 22, No. 3, 1983, pp. 211-215.
[14] G. Crookes, Action Research for Second Language Teachers: Going Beyond Teacher Research, Applied Linguistics, Vol. 14, No. 2, 1993, pp. 130-144.
[15] D. Allwright, J. Hanks, General Introduction: Learners, and What We Think of Them, The Developing Language Learner, Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 1-11.
[16] G. Barkhuizen, Topics, Aims, and Constraints in English Teacher Research: A Chinese Case Study, TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2009, pp. 113-125.
[17] S. Borg, Language Teacher Research Engagement, Language Teaching, Vol. 43, No. 4, 2010, p. 391.
[18] F. J. Aga, Motivating and/or De-motivating Environments to Do Action Research: The Case of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language in Ethiopian Universities, Educational Action Research, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2017, pp. 203-222.
[19] Official Dispatch No. 4241/BGDĐT-GDTrH on Guidelines for Research Activities and The National Science and Engineering Fair for Upper Secondary Students 2013-2014, Hanoi, Vietnam: Ministry of Education and Training, 2013.
[20] A. Burns, Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching: A Guide for Practitioners, New York: Routledge, 2010.
[21] M. Hammersley, Action Research: A Contradiction in Terms? Oxford Review of Education, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2004, pp. 165-181.
[22] S. Kemmis, M. Wilkinson, Participatory Action Research and the Study of Practice, Action Research in Practice: Partnerships for Social Justice in Education, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1998, pp. 21-36.
[23] G. E. Mills, Action Research: A Guide for the Teacher Researcher (4th ed.), Boston, MA: Pearson, 2010.
[24] C. V. Le, Action Research for the Professional Development of English Language Teachers in Vietnam: Insight From a Training Project, The Professional Development of English Language Teachers in Asia: Lessons from Japan and Vietnam, New York: Routledge, 2018.
[25] L. Baartman, L. Ruijs, Comparing Students’ Perceived and Actual Competence in Higher Vocational Education, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2011, pp. 385-398.
[26] E. M. Braun, H. Sheikh, B. Hannover, Self‐rated Competences and Future Vocational Success: a Longitudinal Study, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2011, pp. 417-427.
[27] M. Manolescu, School Competence Between Behaviourism and Cognitivism or the Cognitive Approach to Schooling, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 76, 2013, pp. 912-916.
[28] E. Olehnovica, I. Bolgzda, M. K. Pauliņa, Individual Potential of Doctoral Students: Structure of Research Competences and Self-Assessment, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 174, 2015, pp. 3557-3564.
[29] D. Potolea, Doctoral Studies and Research Competences, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 76, 2013, pp. 935-946.
[30] N. N. Khan, S. Z. Kolumbayevam R. K. Karsybayeva, R. A. Nabuova, M. B. Kurmanbekova, A. D. Syzdykbayeva, Evaluation of the Program Effectiveness of Research Competence Development in Prospective Elementary School Teachers, International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, Vol. 11, No. 18, 2016, pp. 12299-12316.
[31] D. Yayli, A Hands-on Experience of English Language Teachers as Researchers, Teacher Development, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2012, pp. 255-27
[32] C. M. Toquero, Real-World: Preservice Teachers' Research Competence and Research Difficulties in Action Research, Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2020, pp. 126-148.
[33] A. P. Bromley, J. R. Boran, W. A. Myddelton, Investigating the Baseline Skills of Research Students Using a Competency-based Self-Assessment Method, Active Learning in Higher Education, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2007, pp. 117-137.
[34] RCUK, RCUK Impact Requirements Frequently Asked Questions,, 2011 (accessesd on: September 24th, 2020).
[35] M. T. Vu, Between Two Worlds? Research Engagement Dilemmas of University English Language Teachers in Vietnam, RELC Journal, 003368821988478, 2020, https://doi.org10.1177/0033688219884782.
[36] N. V. Ivankova, J. W. Creswell, S. L. Stick, Using Mixed-methods Sequential Explanatory Design: From Theory to Practice, Field methods, Vol. 18, No.1, 2006, pp. 3-20.
[37] RCUK, Joint Statement of the Research Councils,!/file/Joint-skills-statement.doc/, 2001 (accessesd on: September 24th, 2020).
[38] Nguyen, T. Q. T., The Influence of Traditional Beliefs on Vietnamese College Lecturers’ Perceptions of Face, Journal of Education for Teaching, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2015, pp. 203-214.
[39] J. Chung, G. S. Monroe, Exploring Social Desirability Bias, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 44, No. 4, 2003, pp. 291-302.
[40] V. Clarke, V. Braun, Thematic Analysis. in Encyclopedia of Critical, New York: Springer, 2014, pp. 1947-1952.
[41] L. P. H. Huong, Y. Marie, Evaluating in-service Training for Primary English Teachers: A Case Study in Central Vietnam, The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2016, pp. 163-191.
[42] V. H. Phan, Investigating the Impacts of National Foreign Language 2020 Project on the Professional Development, Danang: The International Academic Forum, 2015 (in Vietnamese).
[43] Vo, T. K. A., Evaluating the Implementation of Action Research Course in An in-service Teacher Training Program in Vietnam, Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), Vol. 2, No. 2, 2017, pp. 88-97.
[44] S. Borg, Conditions for Teacher Research, English Teaching Forum, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2006, pp. 22-27.
[45] J. Gilmore, D. Feldon, Measuring Graduate Students' Teaching and Research Skills Through Self-Report: Descriptive Findings and Validity Evidence, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO, April 30-May 4, 2010, = ED509407/, 2010 (accessesd on: September 24th, 2020).
[46] V. L. Nguyen, IT Application in Foreign Language Education: From International Experience to Real State of Affairs in Vietnam, VNU Journal of Science: Education Research, Vol. 32, No. 2, 2016.
[47] J. London, (Ed.), Education in Vietnam, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2011.
[48] Directive No.55/CT-BGDĐT on Promoting Teaching, Training, and Applying ICT in Education - period 2008-2012, Hanoi, Vietnam: Ministry of Education and Training (in Vietnamese).
[49] D. Nunan, Methods in Second Language Classroom-Oriented Research: A Critical Review, Studies, Second Language Acquisition, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1991, pp. 249-274.
[50] F. Green, D. Ashton, A. Felstead, Estimating the Determinants of Supply of Computing, Problem‐Solving, Communication, Social, and Teamworking Skills, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 53, No. 3, 2001, pp. 406-433.
[51] I. J. Kemp, L. Seagraves, Transferable Skills - a Higher Education Deliver?. Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 20, No. 3, 1995, pp. 315-328.
[52] X. V. Ha, J. C. Murray, Corrective Feedback: Beliefs and Practices of Vietnamese Primary EFL Teachers, Language Teaching Research, 2020,
[53] K. Hyland, F. Hyland, F. (Eds.), Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues, Cambridge University Press, 2019.
[54] M. Seker, A. Dincer, An Insight to Students' Perceptions on Teacher Feedback in Second Language Writing Classes, English Language Teaching, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2014, pp. 73-83.
[55] M. Barahona, Exploring Models of Team Teaching in Initial Foreign/Second Language Teacher Education: a Study in Situated Collaboration, Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), Vol. 42, No. 12, 2017,
pp. 144-161.
[56] F. Lauermann, Teacher Responsibility from the Teacher’s Perspective, International Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 65, 2014, pp. 75-89.
[57] H. B. Yin, Societal Culture and Teachers’ Responses to Curriculum Reform: Experiences from China, Asia Pacific Education Review, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2013, pp. 391-401.
[58] E. Saito, A. Tsukui, Y. Tanaka, Problems on Primary School-based In-service Training in Vietnam: A Case Study of Bac Giang Province, International Journal of Educational Development, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2008, pp. 89-103.
[59] A. N. Wulyani, A. Saukah, A. Syahid, I. L. P. Utami, S. Susilo, F. Fiftinova, M. Amin, Understanding English Language Teachers’ Views of Teacher Research: a Report from Indonesia, TEFLON Journal, Vol. 32, No. 2, 2021, pp. 362-388.
[60] J. F. D’Angelo, the Status of ELF in Japan, the Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca, Routledge, 2017, pp. 165-175.
[61] H. A. Pham, B. T. Tan, Developing A Theoretical Framework for ESP Teacher Training in Vietnam, The Asian ESP Journal, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2016, pp. 66-84.
[62] K. Dikilitaş, M. Wyatt, Learning Teacher-research-mentoring: Stories from Turkey, Teacher Development, Vol. 22, No. 4, 2018, pp. 537-553.
[63] M. Z. M. Amin, R. A. Rashid, K. S. M. Teh, Investigating Issues and Challenges in Employing Action Research for Teacher Training in Malaysian Context, International Journal of Education and Practice, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2019,
pp. 30-40.
[64] T. A. Jiyenbekovna, N. Uzbekistan, Formation of the System of Increasing the Qualification of Teachers in Asian Countries, European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences Vol. 7, No. 10, 2019.
[65] L. T. Pham, M. Hayden, Research in Vietnam: the Experience of The Humanities and Social Sciences, Journal of International and Comparative Education (JICE), 2019, pp. 27-40.
[66] R. Damayanti, E. D. Nawawinetu, Determinant Factors of Work Stress among Teaching and Non-Teaching Staff in Indonesia, Executive Editor, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2019, pp. 307.
[67] S. Shingphachanh, Teachers’ Understanding and Concerns about the Practices of Lesson Study in Suburb Schools in Laos, International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 2018.
[68] M. T. Vu, The Practising Adaptive Expert: Professionalism as Constructed in Vietnam English Language Teacher Policy, English Language Teacher Preparation in Asia, Rouledge, 2018, pp. 261-277.
[69] X. A. Gao, G. Barkhuizen, A. Chow, Nowadays Teachers Are Relatively Obedient: Understanding Primary School English Teachers’ Conceptions of and Drives for Research in China, Language Teaching Research, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2010, pp. 61-81.
[70] M. B. Mehrani, A Narrative Study of Iranian EFL Teachers' Experiences of Doing Action Research, Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2017, pp. 93-112.
[71] M. L. Blanton, D. A. Stylianou, Interpreting a Community of Practice Perspective in Discipline-Specific Professional Development in Higher Education, Innovative Higher Education, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2009, pp. 79-92.
[72] K. R. Stevenson, The Relationship of School Facilities Conditions to Selected Student Academic Outcomes: a Study of South Carolina Public Schools, SC Education Oversight Committee, 2001.
[73] M. E. Sheets, The Relationship between the Condition of School Facilities and Certain Educational Outcomes, Particularly in Rural Public High Schools in Texas, Doctoral Dissertation, Texas Tech University, 2009.
[74] C. Lotter, J. A. Yow, T. T. Peters, Building a Community of Practice around Inquiry Instruction Through a Professional Development Program, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2014, pp. 1-23.
[75] X. Gao, A. W. K. Chow, Primary School English Teachers’ Research Engagement, ELT Journal, Vol. 66, No. 2, 2012, pp. 224-232.
[76] H. T. M. Nguyen, T. Bui, Teachers’ Agency And The Enactment of Educational Reform In Vietnam, Current Issues in Language Planning, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2016, pp. 88-105.
[77] D. Atay, Teacher Research for Professional Development. ELT Journal, Vol. 62, No. 2, 2008, pp. 139-147.
[78] M. Christianakis, Collaborative Research and Teacher Education, Issues in Teacher Education, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2010, pp. 109-125.
[79] L. D. Hammond, Teacher Education and the American Future, Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 61, No. 1-2, 2010, pp. 35-47.
[80] K. W. Eva, J. P. W. Cunnington, H. I. Reiter, D. R. Keane, G. R. Norman, How Can I Know What I Don’t Know? Poor Self-Assessment in a Well-Defined Domain, Advances in Health Science Education, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2004, pp. 211-224.
[81] J. Kruger, D. Dunning, Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 77, No. 6, 1999, pp. 1121-1134.
[82] Z. Dörnyei, Attitudes, Orientations, and Motivations In Language Learning: Advances In Theory, Research, And Applications, Language learning, Vol. 53, No. 1, 2003, pp. 3-32.
[83] T. Edwards, J. Fitz, G. Whitty, Private Schools And Public Funding: A Comparison of Recent Policies in England and Australia, Comparative Education, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2010, pp. 29-45.
[84] M. Haque, Sampling Methods in Social Research, Global Research Methodology, Vol. 8, No. 5, 2010, pp. 1-6.