Nguyen Tung Lam, Tran Nguyen Thanh Binh, Nguyen Ngoc Minh Phuong

Main Article Content

Abstract

Digital transformation in education proposed many changes in term of the formation and paradigm of teaching, assessment and evaluation in all aspects. The ability to integrate online platforms, tools, and technology solutions to increase interactivity and personalization etc. considers new opportunities and challenges for the application of online (remote) assessment and supervision platforms. As a phenomenon of online learning mode the online proctored examinations (OPE) have been considered one of the foremost online proctoring options that share the features of a real examination (paperless) in higher education institutions (HEIs) with a proctor observing examinations remotely. In teaching practice today, with online learning tendency the online proctoring (OP) interest rises for some time and accelerated by COVID-19 pandemic. Many of these online learning programs also include online assessment (online exams) that raise some of the issues and challenges associated with plagiarism and academic integrity in general. One of
the ways to deal with some of these challenges is the adoption of online proctoring tools for
online assessment.

Keywords: Online assessment; online (e-)proctoring; exam in eLearning; HE students’ competence.

References

[1] O. R. Harmon, J. Lambrinos, J. Buffolino, Assessment Design and Cheating Risk in Online Instruction, Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2010, pp. 23-33.
[2] S. Dendir, R. S. Maxwell, Cheating in Online Courses: Evidence from Online Proctoring, Computers in Human Behavior Reports, Vol. 2, 2020, pp. 1-10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100033.
[3] H. S. Owens, Cheating within Online Assessments: A Comparison of Cheating Behaviors in Proctored and Unproctored Environments, Mississippi State University, 2015.
[4] J. M. Dyer, H. Pettyjohn, S. Saladin, Academic Dishonesty and Testing: How Student Beliefs and Test Settings Impact Decisions to Cheat, Journal of the National College Testing Association, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2020, pp. 1-30.
[5] D. Foster, H. Layman, Online Proctoring Systems Compared, 2013.
[6] L. Sietses, White Paper Online Proctoring, Questions and Answers about Remote Proctoring, Utrecht: SURF, 2016.
[7] H. Shengnan, N. Shahrokh, A. W. Yilma, Balasuriya, Balasuriya Lekamalage Prasanna, Svee, Eric-Oluf, Digital Proctoring in Higher Education: a Systematic Literature Review, ECIS 2022 Research, 2002, pp. 57.
[8] L. Vladimir, Uskov, J. P. Bakken, J. Robert, Howlett, L. C. Jain, Smart Universities, Concepts, Systems, and Technologies, Springer International Publishing AG, 2018.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.