A Comparative Analysis of Teacher Education Pathways: United States vs. Vietnam
Main Article Content
Abstract
This report provides a comparative analysis of teacher education pathways in the United States and Vietnam, focusing on the diversity of options and requirements, advanced educational attainment of novice teachers, and their subject assignments. Both countries offer traditional undergraduate and postgraduate pathways, and the U.S. offers alternative pathways. Traditional programs in the U.S. typically involve a four-year undergraduate degree in education followed by certification, while alternative programs, such as Teach for America, allow prospective teachers to work full-time in classrooms while completing their education coursework. In Vietnam, teacher education often involves specialized training programs within universities that emphasize pedagogy and subject knowledge. Novice teachers in the U.S. frequently pursue advanced degrees within the first few years of teaching. In Vietnam, advanced education is less common among novice teachers, who instead focus on continuous professional development. Subject assignments in the U.S. are typically aligned with teachers' training and certification areas, but teacher shortages can lead to out-of-field teaching. In contrast, subject assignments in Vietnam are more rigid, with teachers usually teaching subjects they specialized in during their training. This report highlights the strengths and challenges of each system and thus contributes to the global discourse on teacher education, aiming to inform policy decisions and improve teacher preparation programs worldwide.
References
[2] K. Zeichner, The Struggle for the Soul of Teaching and Teacher Education in the USA, Journal of Education for Teaching, Vol. 40, No. 5, 2014, pp. 551-568, https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2014.956544.
[3] H. T. M. Nguyen, T. T. L. Nguyen, English Language Teacher Education in Vietnam: Research and Practice, In Handbook of Research on Teacher Education in the Digital Age, IGI Global, 2019, pp. 157-178.
[4] M. C. Smith, A. M. Villegas, Framing Teacher Preparation Research: An Overview of the Field, Part 1, Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 66, No. 1, 2015, pp. 7-20, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114549072.
[5] R. Ingersoll, L. Merrill, H. May, What are the Effects of Teacher Education and Preparation on Beginning Teacher Attrition? Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania, 2014.
[6] L. V. Canh, Great Expectations: The TESOL Practicum as a Professional Learning Experience, TESOL Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2014, pp. 199-224.
[7] R. M. Ingersoll, E. Merrill, D. Stuckey, G. Collins, Seven Trends: The Transformation of the Teaching Force - Updated October, 2018.
[8] M. Akiba, G. K. LeTendre, Improving Teacher Quality: The U.S. Teaching Force in Global Context, Teachers College Press, 2009.
[9] UNESCO. Education 2030: Incheon declaration and framework for action for the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 4, 2015, https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245656.
[10] R. Ingersoll, L. Merrill, H. May, What are the Effects of Teacher Education and Preparation on Beginning Teacher Attrition? Research Report (#RR-82), Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania, 2018.
[11] L, D. Hammond, Teacher Education and the American Future, Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 61, No. 1-2, 2010, pp. 35-47.
[12] Teach for America, Our Work, 2023.
[13] National Center for Teacher Residencies, What is a Teacher Residency, 2022.
[14] C. Redding, T. M. Smith, Easy in, Easy Out: Are Alternatively Certified Teachers Turning Over at Increased Rates? American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 53, No. 4, 2016, pp. 1086-1125.
[15] U. T. Ho, B. A. Lepage, W. T. Fang, Environmental Education in Pre-school Teacher Training Programs in Vietnam: Situations and Challenges, Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, Vol. 44, No. 4, 2022, pp. 703-722, https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2022.2136552.
[16] T. Hamano, Educational Reform and Teacher Education in Vietnam, Asian Perspectives on Teacher Education (1.ed). Routledge, 2010.
[17] H. T. L. Ha, K. A. T. Pham, T. H. Nguyen, T. T. H. Duong, Training Pedagogical Skills: Evaluation of Lecturers and Teacher Training Students at Educational Universities in Vietnam, EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, Vol. 17, No. 12, 2021, pp. 1-13.
[18] B. Q. Dinh, Innovation in teacher training model, Journal of Science and Technology, Hung Vuong University, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2011, pp. 46-54
[19] Ministry of Education and Training, Vietnam, Annual Report on Education in Vietnam, Hanoi, Vietnam: MOET, 2020.
[20] N. H. Tran, T. D. Truong, H. T. Dinh, L. T. Do, T. T. Tran, M. T. Phan, Significance of Teacher Professional Development in Response to the Current General Education Reforms in Vietnam: Perceptions of School Principals and Teachers, Problems of Education in the 21st Century, Vol. 78, No. 3, 2020, pp. 449-464.
[21] National Center for Education Statistics, Characteristics of Public School Teachers, 2020.
[22] L. D. Hammond, M. E. Hyler, M. Gardner, Effective Teacher Professional Development, Learning Policy Institute, 2017.
[23] U. S. Department of Education, Teacher Preparation Programs, 2021.
[24] L. D. Hammond, C. Campbell, A. L. Goodwin, K. Hammerness, E. L. Low, A. McIntyre, K. Zeichner, Empowered Educators: How High-Performing Systems Shape Teaching Quality Around the World, John Wiley & Sons, 2017.
[25] Ministry of Education and Training, Vietnam, Report on the Implementation of Teacher Education Policies, Hanoi, Vietnam: MOET, 2020.