Assessing Preservice Teachers’ Satisfaction with Integrated Training Programs in Vietnam: A Case Study at Vietnam National University, Hanoi
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study evaluates preservice teachers’ satisfaction with integrated teacher education programs in Vietnam, focusing on two majors: Natural Science Education and History-Geography Education. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining a survey of 295 students at the University of Education, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, with in-depth interviews involving 12 lecturers and 6 academic administrators directly engaged in program implementation. Data were collected using a five-point Likert-scale questionnaire and analyzed through Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), descriptive statistics, independent-samples t-tests, one-way ANOVA, and multiple linear regression. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) revealed four key factors affecting students’ satisfaction, represented by observed variables associated with curriculum content and structure, teaching and assessment practices, academic staff and learning support, and professional development and teaching practicum opportunities. The findings indicate that students generally reported a relatively high level of satisfaction with the integrated teacher education programs. Multiple regression analysis showed that teaching and learning support exerted the strongest influence on overall student satisfaction, followed by curriculum content and structure, professional development opportunities, and learning facilities. In addition, students intending to pursue teaching careers reported significantly higher satisfaction than those without such intentions (t = 2.86; p = 0.008). Qualitative findings corroborated the quantitative results while highlighting several challenges, including heavy course workloads, insufficient interdisciplinary coherence among some modules, and limitations in practicum support mechanisms. The study provides empirical evidence for improving integrated teacher education programs and contributes practical recommendations for enhancing program quality and relevance in preparing interdisciplinary teachers within the context of Vietnam’s ongoing general education reform.
References
[2] P. Q. Hong, N. N. Danh, Restructuring the Teacher Education System in Vietnam, International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2020, pp. 29-43, https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.4.3..
[3] T. N. Hai, T. T. Dinh, D. T. H. Van, D. T. L. Hang, T. T. Anh, P. T. M. Huong, Significance of Teacher Professional Development in Response to Educational Reform in Vietnam: Perceptions of School Principals and Teachers, Problems of Education in the 21st Century, Vol. 78, No. 3, 2020, pp. 449-464,
https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/20.78.449.
[4] T. T. Q. Nga, L. T. N. Anh, Curriculum Reform in Vietnam: Teacher Autonomy and the Reality of its Implementation in Classrooms, International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2025, pp. 1-22, https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.1.1.
[5] World Bank, Transforming Teacher Education over three Generations, https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/88896b5d6bac3c34dbc4771110d34f08-0510022025/original/LEAP-Teachers-and-School-Leadership-Case-Study-Viet-Nam-ENG.pdf, (accessed on: January 20th, 2026).
[6] K. M. Zeichner, Rethinking the Connections between Campus Courses and Field Experiences in College- and University-based Teacher Education, Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 61, No. (1-2), 2010, pp. 89-99,
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347671.
[7] G. C. S. Bahadur, S. K. Gurung, R. L. Poudel, U. S. Yadav, A. Bhattacharjee, B. R. Dhungana, The Effect of Higher Education Service Quality on Satisfaction Among Business Students in India and Nepal, Cogent Education, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2393521.
[8] M. D. D. J. Vigaray, P. L. Chaves, E. G. Gascón, E. G. Cordero, Student Satisfaction: Examining Capacity Development and Environmental Factors in Higher Education Institutions, Heliyon, Vol. 10, No. 17, 2024,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36699.
[9] K. M. Elliot, D. Shin, Student Satisfaction: An Alternative Approach to Assessing this Important Concept, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2002, pp. 197-209, https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080022000013518.
[10] N. C. Hai, Factors Affecting Student Satisfaction with Higher Education Service Quality in Vietnam, European Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2022, pp. 339-351, https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.339.
[11] L. Harvey, Student Feedback, Quality in Higher Education, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2003, pp. 3-20, https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320308164.
[12] V. T. T. Hoai, Integrated Teaching Competency Framework for General Education Program: Suggestions and Recommendations for Natural Science Teachers, VNU Journal of Science: Education Research, Vol. 37, No. 4, 2021, https://js.vnu.edu.vn/ER/article/view/4609.
[13] M. T. Tessema, K. Ready, W. Yu, Factors Affecting College students’ Satisfaction with Major Curriculum: Evidence from Nine Years of Data, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2012, pp. 34-44.
[14] A. W. Astin. What Matters in College? Four Critical Years Revisited. John Wiley and Sons, 1997, ISBN: 978-0-7879-0838-6.
[15] R. S. Lange, Book Review: T. Pascarella, P. Terenzin (2005), How College Affects Students, A Third Decade of Research (2nd ed.) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Journal of Student Affairs in Africa, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2014,
https://doi.org/10.14426/jsaa.v2i2.70.
[16] J. Biggs, C. Tang, G. Kennedy, Teaching for Quality Learning at University 5e. McGraw-Hill Education (UK), 2022, ISBN 978-0-335-25083-7.
[17] L. D. Hammond, Teacher Education Around the World: What can We Learn from International Practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2017, pp. 291-309, https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399.
[18] L. Ho, C. Dimmock, Changing Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices Towards Learner-centred Education in Vietnam. PRACTICE, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2023, pp. 200-219, https://doi.org/10.1080/25783858.2023.2177191.