Scalar sector interactions in BDW model
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the Bélanger-Delaunay-Westhoff model, vectorlike fermions and a new scalar sector charged under an extra Abelian gauge symmetry are introduced to explain the flavor observables, and the muon . In this paper, we focus our study to the scalar sector of this model and the relevant interactions. The interaction terms including the exotic Yukawa, the gauge interactions, and the scalar 3-point and 4-point interactions are derived together with the corresponding Feynman rules. It is shown that the new scalar can decay into a pair of standard-model-like Higgs bosons. This channel is considered by analyzing the decay width and its parameter dependence.
Keywords:
Standard model extension, new physics, scalar particle, fundamental interaction, abelian gauge symmetry
References
[1] D. P. Aguillard et al. [Muon g-2], Measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 0.20 ppm. Physical Review Letters 131.16 (2023): 161802, arXiv:2308.06230 [hep-ex].
[2] W. G. Parrott et al. [HPQCD], Standard Model predictions for B→Kl^+ l^-,B→Kl_1^+ l_2^-,B→Kνν ̅ using form factors from N_f=2+1+1 lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 107, no.1, 014511 (2023) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D 107, no.11, 119903 (2023)] [arXiv:2207.13371 [hep-ph]].
[3] G. Bélanger, C. Delaunay, S. Westhoff, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 055021, arXiv:1507.06660 [hep-ph].
[4] G. Bélanger, C. Delaunay, Phys. Rev. D 94 (7) (2016) 075019, arXiv:1603.03333 [hep-ph].
[5] T. M. Hieu, D. Q. Sang, T. Q. Trang, Communications in Physics, Vol. 30, No. 3 (2020), pp. 231-244.
[6] S. Q. Dinh, H. M. Tran, Phys. Rev. D 104 (11) (2021) 115009, arXiv:2011.07182 [hep-ph].
[7] S. Q. Dinh, H. M. Tran, Nucl. Phys. B 997 (2023) 116384, arXiv:2303.14913 [hep-ph].
[8] R. L. Workman, Particle Data Group, PTEP 2022 (2022) 083C01.
[9] B. Belfatto, R. Beradze, Z. Berezhiani, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2) (2020) 149, arXiv:1906.02714 [hep-ph].
[10] A.M. Coutinho, A. Crivellin, C.A. Manzari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (7) (2020) 071802, arXiv:1912.08823 [hep-ph].
[11] A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (11) (2020) 111801, arXiv:2002.07184 [hep-ph].
[12] M. Kirk, Phys. Rev. D 103 (3) (2021) 035004, arXiv:2008.03261 [hep-ph].
[13] A. Crivellin, C.A. Manzari, M. Montull, Phys. Rev. D 104 (11) (2021) 115016, arXiv:2103.12003 [hep-ph].
[14] A. Crivellin, M. Kirk, T. Kitahara, F. Mescia, arXiv:2212.06862 [hep-ph].
[2] W. G. Parrott et al. [HPQCD], Standard Model predictions for B→Kl^+ l^-,B→Kl_1^+ l_2^-,B→Kνν ̅ using form factors from N_f=2+1+1 lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 107, no.1, 014511 (2023) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D 107, no.11, 119903 (2023)] [arXiv:2207.13371 [hep-ph]].
[3] G. Bélanger, C. Delaunay, S. Westhoff, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 055021, arXiv:1507.06660 [hep-ph].
[4] G. Bélanger, C. Delaunay, Phys. Rev. D 94 (7) (2016) 075019, arXiv:1603.03333 [hep-ph].
[5] T. M. Hieu, D. Q. Sang, T. Q. Trang, Communications in Physics, Vol. 30, No. 3 (2020), pp. 231-244.
[6] S. Q. Dinh, H. M. Tran, Phys. Rev. D 104 (11) (2021) 115009, arXiv:2011.07182 [hep-ph].
[7] S. Q. Dinh, H. M. Tran, Nucl. Phys. B 997 (2023) 116384, arXiv:2303.14913 [hep-ph].
[8] R. L. Workman, Particle Data Group, PTEP 2022 (2022) 083C01.
[9] B. Belfatto, R. Beradze, Z. Berezhiani, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2) (2020) 149, arXiv:1906.02714 [hep-ph].
[10] A.M. Coutinho, A. Crivellin, C.A. Manzari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (7) (2020) 071802, arXiv:1912.08823 [hep-ph].
[11] A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (11) (2020) 111801, arXiv:2002.07184 [hep-ph].
[12] M. Kirk, Phys. Rev. D 103 (3) (2021) 035004, arXiv:2008.03261 [hep-ph].
[13] A. Crivellin, C.A. Manzari, M. Montull, Phys. Rev. D 104 (11) (2021) 115016, arXiv:2103.12003 [hep-ph].
[14] A. Crivellin, M. Kirk, T. Kitahara, F. Mescia, arXiv:2212.06862 [hep-ph].